Friday, April 11, 2008
         
         
         | 
 |  | michelle cheng man yun |  | may have up to... 7
 
 |  | Boyfriends Before Marriage!  | 
 | 
| 
 |  | cheng man yun michelle |  | may have up to... 23
 
 |  | Boyfriends Before Marriage!  | 
 | 
HAHAHAHA I DUNO I WANT TO BE MICHELLE CHENG MAN YUN OR CHENG MAN YUN MICHELLE. BUT I DUN THINK I CAN TAKE SO MANY HEARTBREAKS!
 
 
 
 
the sense of giving is great. however, not all types. 
i am definitely not restricting myself to enjoy stuffs with friends.
i love being with friends. irregardless how bored my face shows. cos being alone is never fun.
i say. i will only do this do that with my boyfriend. not because i feel that i cant enjoy with my friends. but, if every boy were to be out with me. why would there evn be a term boyfriend. every boy can be my boyfriend. its a matter of choice only.
there are things that i draw a line. i know what you mean when you say it isnt boyfriends that can let me have fun.
BUT I CHOOSE TO. cos if so, my boyfriend is special to me. 
no one else can be that special.
i dun mean it in the offensive way, but i just dun find it special anymore if experiences shared with bf and friends are the same.
you get what i mean?
i know you mean well and you just want we both to have fun. 
ya i am enjoying myself.
i am.
so if i dun like something, as you say i have a choice.
i have my own thinking.
and that is how i think.
so even if i reject sth or spoil plan (sorry) it doesnt mean there arent other places where we can have fun, comfortably. 
i know there is platonic love. but i dun even think that term should even be used.
why is it so that when a girl n a boy be friends cant just be friends?
what platonic love?
you boy you girl i dun care. we are friends.
so if my friend is a girl, we must remain platonic love?
i think i am getting agitated cos my mum is nagging. shall not type anymore.
 
 
 
 
 
Labels: bfs
  8:58 PM